Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
J Med Genet ; 59(12): 1179-1188, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2193899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing affords multiple opportunities for women with breast cancer, however, current UK NHS models for delivery of germline genetic testing are clinician-intensive and only a minority of breast cancer cases access testing. METHODS: We designed a rapid, digital pathway, supported by a genetics specialist hotline, for delivery of germline testing of BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 (BRCA-testing), integrated into routine UK NHS breast cancer care. We piloted the pathway, as part of the larger BRCA-DIRECT study, in 130 unselected patients with breast cancer and gathered preliminary data from a randomised comparison of delivery of pretest information digitally (fully digital pathway) or via telephone consultation with a genetics professional (partially digital pathway). RESULTS: Uptake of genetic testing was 98.4%, with good satisfaction reported for both the fully and partially digital pathways. Similar outcomes were observed in both arms regarding patient knowledge score and anxiety, with <5% of patients contacting the genetics specialist hotline. All progression criteria established for continuation of the study were met. CONCLUSION: Pilot data indicate preliminary demonstration of feasibility and acceptability of a fully digital pathway for BRCA-testing and support proceeding to a full powered study for evaluation of non-inferiority of the fully digital pathway, detailed quantitative assessment of outcomes and operational economic analyses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN87845055.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Referral and Consultation , Humans , Female , State Medicine , Telephone , Genetic Testing , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , United Kingdom
2.
Br J Cancer ; 123(4): 499-500, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-828125

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary metastasectomy is widely and increasingly practiced in the belief that this intervention can cure patients with colorectal cancer, and that without it few survive 5 years. No good evidence exists supporting such convictions, indeed recent trial results challenge them. What evidence underpins this acceptance of illusory truths or misconceptions?


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Metastasectomy/methods , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Standard of Care , Survival Analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL